The highest jumps in visibility were done by Metgen, Nodax and Woodly.
Nodax (Danimer Scientific) is the leading brand in November, replacing Mater-Bi (Novamont) who had been the leading brand for a few months.
Danimer Scientific makes its first appearance in the top 10 due to its new factory. This news item had the potential to bring them to the first place. Danimer Scientific and Nodax seem to be the winner of this month.
Avantium is the company that has been the most consistent in communications for the past 2 or 3 months.
Bioplastics Ranking November 2019
NAMES
NOV
OCT
NOV VR
NOVAMONT
1
2
100
BIO-ON
2
1
97.52
AVANTIUM
3
5
87.98
DANIMER SCIENTIFIC
4
13
72.91
BASF
5
3
69.59
STORA ENSO
6
7
63.86
BRASKEM
7
11
46.39
NESTE
8
6
43.35
CORBION
9
4
42.08
METGEN
10
99
39.11
NODAX
11
88
35.50
WOODLY
12
53
32.81
NATUREWORKS
13
8
31.54
DUPONT
14
20
26.59
TOTAL CORBION
15
9
25.53
FUTAMURA
16
14
22.42
MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL
17
12
22.28
ARKEMA
18
21
22.14
METABOLIX
19
15
21.57
BIOAMBER
20
26
19.24
MITSUI CHEMICALS
21
16
MATER-BI
22
10
NOVOZYMES
23
30
BIOTEC
24
49
SOLVAY
25
37
AVANTIUM RENEWABLE POLYMERS
26
48
CLARIANT
27
19
SULAPAC
28
68
ARCTIC BIOMATERIALS
29
31
TIPA
30
N/A
DSM
31
33
VERDEZYNE
32
34
YIELD10 BIOSCIENCE
33
28
BEYOND GREEN
34
115
BIOME BIOPLASTICS
35
55
EASTMAN
36
29
KANEKA
37
18
LYONDELLBASELL
38
23
SYNVINA
39
36
NATUREFLEX
40
22
ALPLA
41
N/A
SK CHEMICALS
42
35
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND (ADM)
43
78
CARBIOLICE
44
N/A
API
45
38
REVERDIA
46
50
MYRIANT
47
45
TREVA
48
97
COVESTRO
49
27
FKuR
50
24
CELLOPHANE
51
46
GREEN DOT BIOPLASTICS
52
74
GC INNOVATION AMERICA
53
43
ECOZEN
54
39
FLOREON
55
47
SWEETFOAM
56
51
I'M GREEN
57
62
ALGOPACK
58
40
BIO-FLEX
59
60
CARGILL
60
32
TECNARO
61
41
ARBOBLEND
62
71
DOWDUPONT
63
61
VERSALIS
64
42
GENOMATICA
65
44
BIOMER
66
58
CORNWARE
67
79
LACTIPS
68
25
MINERV
69
54
TAGHLEEF INDUSTRIES
70
52
AVA BIOCHEM
71
75
MYKAI
72
56
EVONIK
73
63
INNOVIA FILMS
74
66
LANZATECH
75
57
TORAY
76
72
BIOCHEMTEX
77
80
CARDIA BIOPLASTICS
78
67
VINMAR
79
64
DURABIO
80
70
ROQUETTE
81
69
BIOSPHERE PLASTIC
82
65
TEIJIN
83
59
ECOFLEX
84
73
BIORGANI
85
90
ECHO INSTRUMENTS
86
87
INGEO
87
77
DURASENSE
88
17
ARBOFORM
89
76
PLA-NET
90
83
VIRENT
91
81
TRIFILON
92
84
YULEX
93
85
LUMINY
94
106
SULZER
95
94
MOBIUS
96
102
DEINOVE
97
113
GUALAPACK GROUP
98
86
NATIVIA
99
91
CIMV
100
82
TERRAVERDAE
101
109
ARNITEL ECO
102
100
DO GREEN
103
107
GOOD NATURED
104
96
BIO4PACK
105
98
ARBOFILL
106
110
NAFIGATE
107
89
RENMATIX
108
92
RADICI GROUP
109
101
DOMTAR
110
122
SOLON
111
108
TEREOS SYRAL
112
114
METSO
113
118
NUREL
114
95
GRABIO
115
112
LIGNOBOOST
116
123
GLYCOSBIO
117
121
BIOBATCH
118
93
GLOBAL BIOPOLYMERS
119
103
BIOHYBRID
120
116
TEKNOR APEX
121
117
BIOSUCCINIUM
122
119
METEX
123
111
CELUS-BI
124
105
XINHUARUN
125
124
FRX POLYMERS
126
126
BIO-SA
127
120
ABM COMPOSITE
128
125
RADILON
129
127
NOFIA
130
128
ANELLOTECH
131
104
TERRALOY
132
129
SUCCINITY
133
N/A
RILSAN
N/A
130
NUPLASTIQ
N/A
131
BIOPLAST
N/A
N/A
DYADIC
N/A
N/A
BIOCHOICE
N/A
N/A
BIODOGRADABLE
N/A
N/A
GOGLIO
N/A
N/A
KINGFA
N/A
N/A
MHG
N/A
N/A
POLYONE
N/A
N/A
PSM
N/A
N/A
TREEMERA
N/A
N/A
TRELLIS BIOPLASTICS
N/A
N/A
ZHEJIANG HISUN BIOMATERIALS
N/A
N/A
MAISTIC
N/A
N/A
BIO-PDO
N/A
N/A
BIOAPPLY
N/A
N/A
BIOBENT
N/A
N/A
BIOFORM
N/A
N/A
BIOFRONT
N/A
N/A
BIOGEM
N/A
N/A
BIOGRADE
N/A
N/A
BIOLITE
N/A
N/A
BIOLOGIQ
N/A
N/A
BIOPAR
N/A
N/A
BIOPLASTICS INTERNATIONAL
N/A
N/A
BIOSTEEL
N/A
N/A
BRONTIDE
N/A
N/A
CHENQI
N/A
N/A
CUPFORMA NATURA
N/A
N/A
ECOPEXX
N/A
N/A
ECOSPRAY
N/A
N/A
EPICEROL
N/A
N/A
FIBROLON
N/A
N/A
HOFFMANN NEOPAC
N/A
N/A
MIREL
N/A
N/A
NEOPAC
N/A
N/A
PERSTOP
N/A
N/A
PLANEXT
N/A
N/A
PLANTIC ECO PLASTIC
N/A
N/A
PLANTRO
N/A
N/A
POLYSORB
N/A
N/A
RADELAST
N/A
N/A
RODENBURG BIOPOLYMERS
N/A
N/A
SOLANYL
N/A
N/A
SPECTALITE
N/A
N/A
STARCHPAK
N/A
N/A
TECHNYL
N/A
N/A
TERRALENE
N/A
N/A
TERRAPRENE
N/A
N/A
TETRA REX
N/A
N/A
TORAYCA
N/A
N/A
Notes
This ranking is based on website statistics of BioplasticsNews.com for the period 1 – 30 November 2020.
Visibility Ratio (VR) shows how the top 20 compare to the leader. The first company gets 100 % per cent, how much do the other companies receive compared to the first.
Not all companies are equal in size. Some companies are only active in bioplastics, others are also active in traditional plastics. Not all companies produce the same type of bioplastics (PLA, PHA, Bio-PE, etc). Not all companies have the same marketing budget (multinationals vs startups). Not all companies have the same place in the bioplastic value chain.
We combine company names and brands: some brands are known by their company name, some companies are known by their brand names.
