These include heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), natural toxins and allergens, concluded the study commissioned by the Food Standards Agency.
‘Bio-based’ packaging materials are derived from biological and renewable resources, which consist of polymers directly extracted or removed from biomass, produced by chemical synthesis using renewable bio-based monomers or produced by microorganisms or genetically modified bacteria.
These innovative and environment-friendly materials include bio-based plastics for food containers, films and composite materials for drink cartons.
But their biodegradability, combined with their manufacture from diverse biomass resources including agri-food by-products, may lead to additional sources of risk that are not observed with plastic FCMs, said a report released last month but finalised in June.
Their processing may also be a source of non-intentionally added substances (NIAS), with potential to migrate upon food contact.
Thermal processing to convert materials into packaging may generate contaminants more frequently associated with food, such as acrylamide, “although this has not been established”, it said.
Biobased Plastics – Advantages & Disadvantages
Chemical Recycling – Advantages & Disadvantages
What is Circular Packaging? Watch Now!
Compostable Plastics – Advantages & Disadvantages
Plastics Recycling – Advantages and Disadvantages
An increasing number of biodegradable and compostable FCMs are coming onto the market and the report said these provide similar “barrier properties” to plastic FCMs, enabling comparable shelf life performance and consumer protection.
However, very limited information is available on many of these materials, it said.
But current risk assessment processes for establishing contaminant chemical transfer from packaging to food would be appropriate for bio-based FCMs.
An evaluation of the EU’s decades-old FCM framework Regulation is currently underway.
At a stakeholder workshop last month, member states, industry and NGOs made a final plea for full harmonisation of EU-wide controls on hazardous chemicals.
Meanwhile, details of another workshop organised by NGO CHEM Trust have come to light.
Held at the end of April under Chatham House rules – this means individual participants’ views cannot be made public – the workshop looked into possible synergies between REACH and FCM laws and whether REACH could have a role in ensuring the safety of FCMs.
Participants at the workshop included experts from the Commission, the European Food Safety Authority (Efsa), Echa and member states.
Overall, they regarded the basic REACH system as “useful” but were concerned that safety assessments made under REACH lose track of substances when they are incorporated into an article, including FCMs, CHEM Trust’s notes from the workshop reveal.
New legislation should create a better link between REACH and FCMs and legislative steps under REACH should also trigger action for FCMs, participants said.
As a minimum, they added, there should be a requirement to re-evaluate the use in FCMs of substances of very high concern (SVHCs), as well as substances restricted under REACH.
Published on chemicalwatch.com
- Japan Environment Council Recommends Action on PFAS
- US Congress Not Amused with Dupont, Chemours and 3M in PFAS Fiasco
- Danish Minister Tired of Waiting for EU and Bans Fluorocarbons in Food Packaging
- Chipotle Defends Biodegradable Packaging Amid PFAS Findings
- Time To Ban PFAS from Food Packaging
- Are Compostable Packaging a Source of Toxic PFAS?